dc.contributor.author | Samset, Bjørn Hallvard | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuglestvedt, Jan S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lund, Marianne Tronstad | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-21T12:47:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-21T12:47:53Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-08-25T14:39:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nature Communications. 2022, 13 (1), . | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-1723 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3119048 | |
dc.description.abstract | In response to our recent paper1 (hereafter SFL20) concerning the relation between natural variability in the climate system and the time to detect a response to emissions mitigation, Lanson et al.2 (hereafter L22) call for ‘a broader debate on how to best assess and communicate emerging effects of climate mitigation in the light of natural variability’. We welcome a broader debate on this aspect of global responses to climate change, attempt to reconcile our views in the following. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Reply to: Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Reply to: Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 0 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 13 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Nature Communications | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41467-022-31426-w | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2046101 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 2 | |