Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSamset, Bjørn Hallvard
dc.contributor.authorFuglestvedt, Jan S.
dc.contributor.authorLund, Marianne Tronstad
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T12:47:53Z
dc.date.available2024-02-21T12:47:53Z
dc.date.created2022-08-25T14:39:09Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationNature Communications. 2022, 13 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2041-1723
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3119048
dc.description.abstractIn response to our recent paper1 (hereafter SFL20) concerning the relation between natural variability in the climate system and the time to detect a response to emissions mitigation, Lanson et al.2 (hereafter L22) call for ‘a broader debate on how to best assess and communicate emerging effects of climate mitigation in the light of natural variability’. We welcome a broader debate on this aspect of global responses to climate change, attempt to reconcile our views in the following.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature ltden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleReply to: Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefitsen_US
dc.title.alternativeReply to: Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefitsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalNature Communicationsen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41467-022-31426-w
dc.identifier.cristin2046101
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal