Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAllen, Myles R.
dc.contributor.authorFriedlingstein, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorGirardin, Cécile A.J.
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorMalhi, Yadvinder
dc.contributor.authorMitchell-Larson, Eli
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Glen Philip
dc.contributor.authorRajamani, Lavanya
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-20T08:50:39Z
dc.date.available2024-02-20T08:50:39Z
dc.date.created2022-12-07T11:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAnnual Review Environment and Resources. 2022, 47 849-887.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1543-5938
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3118584
dc.description.abstractThis review explains the science behind the drive for global net zero emissions and why this is needed to halt the ongoing rise in global temperatures. We document how the concept of net zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions emerged from an earlier focus on stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Using simple conceptual models of the coupled climate–carbon cycle system, we explain why approximately net zero CO2 emissions and declining net energy imbalance due to other climate drivers are required to halt global warming on multidecadal timescales, introducing important concepts, including the rate of adjustment to constant forcing and the rate of adjustment to zero emissions. The concept of net zero was taken up through the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Structured Expert Dialogue, culminating in Article 4of the 2015 Paris Agreement. Increasing numbers of net zero targets have since been adopted by countries, cities, corporations, and investors. The degree to which any entity can claim to have achieved net zero while continuing to rely on distinct removals to compensate for ongoing emissions is at the heart of current debates over carbon markets and offsetting both inside and outside the UNFCCC. We argue that what matters here is not the precise makeup of a basket of emissions and removals at any given point in time, but the sustainability of a net zero strategy as a whole and its implications for global temperature over multidecadal timescales. Durable, climate-neutral net zero strategies require like-for-like balancing of anthropogenic greenhouse gas sources and sinks in terms of both origin (biogenic versus geological) and gas lifetime.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAnnual Reviewen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcarbon budgeten_US
dc.subjectnet zeroen_US
dc.subjectclimate neutralityen_US
dc.subjectnature-based solutionsen_US
dc.subjectgreenhouse gasesen_US
dc.subjectcarbon marketsen_US
dc.subjectParis Agreementen_US
dc.titleNet Zero: Science, Origins, and Implicationsen_US
dc.title.alternativeNet Zero: Science, Origins, and Implicationsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber849-887en_US
dc.source.volume47en_US
dc.source.journalAnnual Review Environment and Resourcesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-105050
dc.identifier.cristin2089982
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/820846en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/869192en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/821205en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/821003en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal