Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Bin
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Jing
dc.contributor.authorZha, Hao
dc.contributor.authorHu, Ruolan
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yalu
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Chengrui
dc.contributor.authorShi, Hongrong
dc.contributor.authorChen, Simiao
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Yue
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Da
dc.contributor.authorAunan, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Shaojun
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiliang
dc.contributor.authorXue, Lan
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shuxiao
dc.coverage.spatialChinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T10:59:30Z
dc.date.available2021-10-08T10:59:30Z
dc.date.created2021-09-24T16:09:15Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Technology. 2021, 55 (14), 10046-10055.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-936X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2788696
dc.description.abstractChina has been promoting one of the world’s largest campaigns for clean heating renovation since 2017. Here, we present an integrated cost–benefit analysis in a major prefecture-level city by combining a large-scale household energy survey and PM2.5 exposure measurement, high-resolution chemical transport simulation, and health impact assessment. We find that the completed renovation decreases the share of solid fuels in the heating energy mix from 96 to 6% and achieves a concomitant reduction of cooking solid-fuel use by 70%. The completed renovation decreases the ambient PM2.5 concentration in Linfen by 0.5–5 μg m–3 (2.4 μg m–3 on average) and decreases the integrated PM2.5 exposure by 4.2 (3.5–5.0) μg m–3. The renovation is estimated to avoid 162 (125–225) and 328 (254–457) premature deaths annually based on two health impact assessment methods. The ratios of monetized health benefits to cost are 1.51 (0.73–2.59) and 3.06 (1.49–5.23) based on the above two methods. The benefit-to-cost ratio is projected to remain high if the renovation is further expanded. More polluted and less wealthy households enjoy larger health benefits but also experience a higher expense increase, suggesting that a more carefully designed subsidy policy is needed to protect low-income households.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherACS Publicationen_US
dc.subjectclean heating renovationen_US
dc.subjectcost−benefit analysisen_US
dc.subjecthousehold air pollutionen_US
dc.subjectPM2.5en_US
dc.subjecthousehold energy surveyen_US
dc.titleHealth Benefits and Costs of Clean Heating Renovation: An Integrated Assessment in a Major Chinese Cityen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber10046-10055en_US
dc.source.volume55en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Science and Technologyen_US
dc.source.issue14en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.est.1c00930
dc.identifier.cristin1938414
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel