Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLewinschal, Anna
dc.contributor.authorEkman, Annica M. L.
dc.contributor.authorHansson, Hans-Christen
dc.contributor.authorSand, Maria
dc.contributor.authorBerntsen, Terje Koren
dc.contributor.authorLangner, Joakim
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T12:49:43Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T12:49:43Z
dc.date.created2019-06-03T14:32:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2019, 19 (4), 2385-2403.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1680-7316
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2759996
dc.description.abstractShort-lived anthropogenic climate forcers (SLCFs), such as sulfate aerosols, affect both climate and air quality. Despite being short-lived, these forcers do not affect temperatures only locally; regions far away from the emission sources are also affected. Climate metrics are often used in a policy context to compare the climate impact of different anthropogenic forcing agents. These metrics typically relate a forcing change in a certain region with a temperature change in another region and thus often require a separate model to convert emission changes to radiative forcing (RF) changes. In this study, we used a coupled Earth system model, NorESM (Norwegian Earth System Model), to calculate emission-to-temperature-response metrics for sulfur diox ide (SO2) emission changes in four different policy-relevant regions: Europe (EU), North America (NA), East Asia (EA) and South Asia (SA). We first increased the SO2 emissions in each individual region by an amount giv ing approximately the same global average radiative forc ing change (−0.45 Wm−2 ). The global mean temperature change per unit sulfur emission compared to the control experiment was independent of emission region and equal to ∼0.006 K(TgSyr−1) −1 . On a regional scale, the Arctic showed the largest temperature response in all experiments. The second largest temperature change occurred in the region of the imposed emission increase, except when South Asian emissions were changed; in this experiment, the temperature response was approximately the same in South Asia and East Asia. We also examined the non-linearity of the temperature response by removing all anthropogenic SO2 emissions over Europe in one experiment. In this case, the tempera ture response (both global and regional) was twice that in the corresponding experiment with a European emission increase. This non-linearity in the temperature response is one of many uncertainties associated with the use of simplified climate metrics.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus publicationsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleLocal and remote temperature response of regional SO2 emissionsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber2385-2403en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicsen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/acp-19-2385-2019
dc.identifier.cristin1702348
cristin.unitcode7475,0,0,0
cristin.unitnameCICERO Senter for klimaforskning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal