Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWoollings, Tim
dc.contributor.authorBarriopedro, David E.
dc.contributor.authorMethven, John
dc.contributor.authorSon, Seok-Woo
dc.contributor.authorMartius, Olivia
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Ben
dc.contributor.authorSillmann, Jana
dc.contributor.authorLupo, Anthony R.
dc.contributor.authorSeneviratne, Sonia I.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T13:34:14Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T13:34:14Z
dc.date.created2018-09-23T22:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Climate Change Reports. 2018, 4 (3), 287-300.
dc.identifier.issn2198-6061
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2753999
dc.description.abstractPurpose of Review Atmospheric blocking events represent some of the most high-impact weather patterns in the mid-latitudes, yet they have often been a cause for concern in future climate projections. There has been low confidence in predicted future changes in blocking, despite relatively good agreement between climate models on a decline in blocking. This is due to the lack of a comprehensive theory of blocking and a pervasive underestimation of blocking occurrence bymodels. This paper reviews the state of knowledge regarding blocking under climate change, with the aim of providing an overview for those working in related fields. Recent Findings Several avenues have been identified by which blocking can be improved in numerical models, though a fully reliable simulation remains elusive (at least, beyond a few days lead time). Models are therefore starting to provide some useful information on how blocking and its impacts may change in the future, although deeper understanding of the processes at play will be needed to increase confidence in model projections. There are still major uncertainties regarding the processes most important to the onset, maintenance and decay of blocking and advances in our understanding of atmospheric dynamics, for example in the role of diabatic processes, continue to inform the modelling and prediction efforts. Summary The term ‘blocking’ covers a diverse array of synoptic patterns, and hence a bewildering range of indices has been developed to identify events. Results are hence not considered fully trustworthy until they have been found using several different methods. Examples of such robust results are the underestimation of blocking by models, and an overall decline in future occurrence, albeit with a complex regional and seasonal variation. In contrast, hemispheric trends in blocking over the recent historical period are not supported by different methods, and natural variability will likely dominate regional variations over the next few decades.
dc.description.abstractBlocking and its Response to Climate Change
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleBlocking and its Response to Climate Change
dc.title.alternativeBlocking and its Response to Climate Change
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber287-300
dc.source.volume4
dc.source.journalCurrent Climate Change Reports
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z
dc.identifier.cristin1612688
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 243953
cristin.unitcode7475,0,0,0
cristin.unitnameCICERO Senter for klimaforskning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel