Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKallbekken, Steffennb_NO
dc.contributor.authorTorvanger, Asbjørnnb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-17T14:31:23Z
dc.date.available2014-03-17T14:31:23Z
dc.date.issued2004nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0504-452Xnb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/192320
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we review the literature on the costs and benefits of geological carbon storage and the estimates of greenhouse gas permit prices under the Kyoto Protocol commitment period and beyond. Combining these results for a set of circumstances, we find that in the near-term Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is likely to be an economically viable option only in a small set of circumstances, particularly enhanced oil recovery. In the medium and longer term, with improvements in CCS technology and the likelihood of increased greenhouse gas permit prices, CCS is likely to become an economically viable option under a wider range of circumstances.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherCICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslonb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofCICERO Working Papernb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCICERO Working Paper;2004:05nb_NO
dc.titleCan geological carbon storage be competitive?nb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber13nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel