Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMatlary, Janne Haalandnb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-17T14:31:08Z
dc.date.available2014-03-17T14:31:08Z
dc.date.issued1995nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0504-452Xnb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/192190
dc.description.abstractThis article criticizes Andrew Moravcsik´s model of two-level states-EU interaction on three counts: it neglects EU actors, assumes the primacy of state actors, and further assumes that interests are formed prior to policy interaction at the EU-level. Empirical evidence of especially the Commission's role in the post-85 period is examined to show the independent actor role of the former. This forms the basis for the subsequent theoretical discussion of the role of non-state actors. The author argues the need for a multi-level model of integration and for a decomposition of the policy-process into the agenda-setting and the negotiation phases. She calls for a processual rather than actor-specific starting point since empirical events have obliterated the assumption of a domestic-international divide and thereby also of the primacy of the state as actor.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherCICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslonb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofCICERO Working Papernb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCICERO Working Paper;1995:05nb_NO
dc.titleThe Commission as policy-maker: The need to venture beyond state-centric integration theorynb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.source.pagenumbernb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel