• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • CICERO Senter for klimaforskning
  • CICERO Working Papers
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • CICERO Senter for klimaforskning
  • CICERO Working Papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Possible criteria for differentiated commitments: Fair or feasible?

Alfsen, Knut H.
Working paper
Thumbnail
View/Open
CICERO_Working_Paper_1997-07.pdf (176.9Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/192160
Date
1997
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • CICERO Working Papers [167]
Abstract
This paper discusses the notion of differentiated commitments or burden sharing in the ongoing negotiations on emissions reductions of greenhouse gases. The negotiations, which takes place in the Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate (AGBM) under the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), is leading up to the third Conference of the Parties (COP-3), which is scheduled to take place in Kyoto in December later this year. The paper briefly surveys some of the main issues in the negotiations and argues that the question of differentiated commitments or burden sharing is only one among many difficult topics on the negotiating table. Based on some proposed principles of ‘fairness’, a few central indicators are identified and we provide data on these for a group of OECD countries. We outline some of the propositions for differentiated commitments in the current negotiations, and concludes that within the framework of the OECD countries, burden sharing is only possible if countries outside of the European Union (EU) can compensate USA for the additional greenhouse gas reductions needed to allow high cost countries to commit to lower abatement than the average reduction level. However, an attractive option, not explored in this paper, is for the group of countries outside EU and USA to make a deal with countries with economies in transition, as these countries generally are expected to have relatively low marginal reduction costs. Further studies of such ‘east-west’ deals are clearly warranted.
Publisher
CICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo
Series
CICERO Working Paper;1997:07

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit