Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRingius, Lassenb_NO
dc.contributor.authorTorvanger, Asbjørnnb_NO
dc.contributor.authorHoltsmark, Bjartnb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-17T14:31:00Z
dc.date.available2014-03-17T14:31:00Z
dc.date.issued1998nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0504-452Xnb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/192138
dc.description.abstractAn important feature of the Protocol concluded in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997 is the differentiation of the climate targets of the industrialized countries. A more systematic approach to burden sharing than that leading to the Kyoto Protocol could help negotiating targets after 2012, and when including developing countries in the group of countries with climate targets at a later stage. The article discusses a number of concepts of equity, examines three specific burden sharing rules and formulae, and presents cost calculations on the burden sharing rules. The three formulae that are explored have some ability to adapt to national circumstances, but none of them creates a burden sharing arrangement that completely equalizes the national income losses as percentage of GDP across the OECD. Nonetheless, the results show that burden sharing rules can be useful tools and provide some, but not all, of the guiding framework for climate policy negotiations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherCICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslonb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofCICERO Working Papernb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCICERO Working Paper;1998:06nb_NO
dc.titleCan multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens? OECD results from three burden-sharing rulesnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.source.pagenumbernb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record