Blar i CICERO Policy Notes på forfatter "Torvanger, Asbjørn"
-
An International Regulatory Framework for Risk Governance of Carbon Capture and Storage
Vajjhala, Shalini; Gode, Jenny; Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;2007:01, Working paper, 2007)CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in geological structures and its possible risks have been topics of extensive study in recent years. In contrast, the legal and regulatory structures necessary to support widespread capture ... -
Effektiv klimapolitikk etter Rio
Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;1993:01, Working paper, 1993) -
Framtidige generasjonar i økonomiske analysar
Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;1993:02, Working paper, 1993) -
Joint Implementation: A promising mechanism for all countries?
Selrod, Rolf; Ringius, Lasse; Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;1995:01, Working paper, 1995)The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change establishes no legal commitments for any of the Parties to reach specific targets of reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Although the Convention emphasizes the ... -
Prerequisites for Joint Implementation projects under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;1993:03, Working paper, 1993) -
Rapport frå 8. Møte i Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate (AGBM), Bonn 22.-31. Oktober 1997
Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;1997:03, Working paper, 1997) -
The state of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations: After the fourth UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP4) in Buenos Aires 2-13 November 1998
Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;1998:05, Working paper, 1998)The fourth Conference of the Parties (COP4) under the Climate Convention (UNFCCC) took place in Buenos Aires, Argentina, from 2–13 November 1998. Summing up the conference, the main impression is that the climate process ... -
Would including more source species enhance the cost-effectiveness of climate policy?
Torvanger, Asbjørn (CICERO Policy Note;2004:02, Working paper, 2004)Incorporating ozone precursors and particle emissions in future climate policy agreements could improve the level of cost-effectiveness, but would also add complexity and complications to negotiation, reporting and ...