Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchwingshackl, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorSillmann, Jana
dc.contributor.authorVicedo-Cabrera, Ana
dc.contributor.authorSandstad, Marit
dc.contributor.authorAunan, Kristin
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T11:13:35Z
dc.date.available2021-05-27T11:13:35Z
dc.date.created2021-03-17T13:42:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEarth's Future. 2021, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2328-4277
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2756625
dc.description.abstractGlobal warming is leading to increased heat stress in many regions around the world. An extensive number of heat stress indicators (HSIs) has been developed to measure the associated impacts on human health. Here we calculate eight HSIs for global climate models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). We compare their future trends as function of global mean temperature, with particular focus on highly populated regions. All analyzed HSIs increase significantly (p < 0.01) in all considered regions. Moreover, the different HSIs reveal a substantial spread ranging from trends close to the rate of global mean temperature up to an amplification of more than a factor of two. Trends change considerably when normalizing the HSIs by accounting for the different scales on which they are defined, but the large spread and strong trends remain. Consistently, exceedances of impact-relevant thresholds are strongly increasing globally, including in several densely populated regions, but also show substantial spread across the selected HSIs. The indicators with the highest exceedance rates vary for different threshold levels, suggesting that the large indicator spread is associated both to differences in trend magnitude and the definition of threshold levels. These results highlight the importance of choosing indicators and thresholds that are appropriate for the respective impact under consideration. Additionally, further validation of HSIs regarding their capability to quantify heat impacts on human health on regional-to-global scales would be of great value for assessing global impacts of future heat stress more reliably.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAGUen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHeat Stress Indicators in CMIP6: Estimating Future Trends and Exceedances of Impact-Relevant Thresholdsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.journalEarth's Futureen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2020EF001885
dc.identifier.cristin1898662
dc.relation.projectEU/H2020/820655en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal