Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTørstad, Vegard H.
dc.description.abstractIn the climate negotiations, conceptions of fairness plays an important role. For a climate agreement to be effective and durable, it must be conceived as fair by as many of its parties as possible. Unfortunately, there is hardly a consensus in the negotiations on what a fair agreement should constitute, and diverging fairness conceptions are at the heart of the conflicts of the negotiations. This thesis is an attempt at understanding this fairness dimension. It attempts to answer two related questions: 1) what do the parties in the negotiations conceive as fair? And 2) why do parties in the negotiations have differing conceptions of what constitutes a fair agreement? The findings of this thesis indicate that there has been little progress on reaching a common understanding of fairness in the negotiations over the last five-year cycle of negotiations that concluded with the Paris agreement. Even though a significant potential for compromise exists, key actors’ positions on the fairness dimension are polarized. This might be an explanation for why a burden-sharing approach is no longer possible in the negotiations. Whether a country is listed as “developing” or “developed” in the UNFCCC is the most important explanatory factor for diverging fairness conceptions - indicating that conceptions of fairness are largely driven by self-interest.nb_NO
dc.publisherCICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo
dc.relation.ispartofCICERO Report
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCICERO Report;2016:04
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.titleWhat’s Fair – and Why? An Empirical Analysis of Distributive Fairness in the Climate Negotiationsnb_NO
dc.typeResearch reportnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200nb_NO

Tilhørende fil(er)


Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC0 1.0 Universal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC0 1.0 Universal